PART II - APPLICATION DATA (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy) 1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions 2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 990805 3. Authority for separation: a. Regulation: Chapter 10, AR 635-200 b. Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial 4. Prior review(s): Records/010711 PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. Service data: 2. Awards and decorations: ARCOM NCOPDR (2) a. Period entered for: 5 Years AAM ASR b. Entry date: 980305 GCMDL (5thAwd) OSR c. Age: 32 Years DOB: 650908 NDSM C/Ach d. Educational level: HS Grad SWASMDLw/2BSS e. Aptitude area score: KLMDL (2) GT: 90 3. Highest grade achieved: f. Length of Service: E6 1 Year(s) 5 Month(s) 1 Day(s) 4. Performance evaluations: See OMPF PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE Status Inclusive dates AWOL Mil conf Civil conf Other 6. Nonjudicial punishment: Date Offense(s) 990413 Operating a passenger car while drunk (981216) and leaving the scene of an accident (981216). _______________________________________ 990517 Letter of reprimand-for driving while under the influence of alcohol, damaging another vehicle and leaving the scene of an accident (Administrative). 7. Court-Martial data: NONE a. SCM: Date Offense(s) b. SPCM: Date Offense(s) c. GCM: Date Offense(s) 8. Remarks: The applicant has a Military Police Report, dated (990114) and an Alcoholic Influence Report dated (981216) in file. SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge RA 841116 861111 Honorable RA 861112 900508 Honorable RA 900509 921101 Honorable RA 921102 951031 Honorable RA 951101 980304 Honorable PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was charged with conspiring to commit larceny and larceny. On 22 July 1999, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter l0, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense. Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits. The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander and intermediate commanders recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 29 July 1999, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank. b. On 5 August 1999, the applicant was discharged. At the time of discharge, the applicant had completed 1 year, 5 months, and 1 day of active military service in the period under review and had a total of 15 years, 5 months and 20 days of active military service. 2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The requests may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS 1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel. As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293. 2. Exhibit(s) submitted: A-1: DD Form 293, dated 020904. A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED) SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable): b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable): PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits 1. Review/hearing information: a. Type requested: ( ) Records review ( X ) Hearing b. Type Held: ( )Records review ( X ) Hearing ( ) Tender Offer c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 18 November 2002. d. Appearance by: Applicant ( X ) Yes ( ) No Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No e. Applicant testified: ( X ) Yes ( ) No f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No g. Witness(es) testified: ( X ) Yes ( ) No 2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: 4 documents. PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS 1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. ( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows: ( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows: Board Issue: (2) The characterization of service was too harsh. b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason 2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity: a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge. b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above. (2) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review. There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness of the offenses. The Board found that the length and quality of the applicant’s service mitigated his misconduct. In view of the foregoing, the Board determined that the characterization of service was inequitable. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. (1) The issue is rejected. The Board determined that the applicant’s misconduct diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge. The Board noted that, after consulting with defense counsel, the applicant voluntarily, and in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser included offenses under the UCMJ. 3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote 1. Board conclusion(s): The discharge was: ( X ) Proper. ( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                     . ( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                      . ( ) Equitable. ( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to General, Under Honorable Conditions. ( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                        under                                 . ( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                         . 2. Voting record: Change No Change Reason 0 5 Characterization 5 0 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document. Department of the Army Review Boards Agency ATTN: Promulgation Team 1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor Arlington, VA 22202-4508 3. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified                            Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 22 November 2002 The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed change(s): ( X ) Change characterization of discharge to General, Under Honorable Conditions. ( X ) Other (see remarks below). Remarks: Restore grade to sergeant/E-5. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: JOHN F. LONG Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant INDEX RECORD: AR Number: 2002078794 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406 Date of Review: 021118 A9218 Character of Service: UD A0113 Date of Discharge: 990805 Authority: AR 635-200 C10 Reason: A7000 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: GD 5-0 A PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name  Reason Characterization CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR 1. Mbr      X      X        2. Mbr      X      X        3. Mbr      X      X        4. Mbr      X      X        5. Mbr      X      X