Application Receipt Date: 070209	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: 960214/Records Review

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: ?????
Discharge Received:     Date: 930302   
Chapter: 10    AR: 635-200
Reason: For the Good of the Service/In Lieu of Court-Martial
RE:     SPD: KFS
Unit/Location: ????? 

Time Lost: ?????

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): ?????

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): ?????

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:    
Current ENL Date: 891115    Current ENL Term: 04 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: ?? Yrs, ??Mos, ??Days ?????
Total Service:  ?? Yrs, ??Mos, ??Days ?????
Previous Discharges: USAR-860108-860123/NA
                                      ADT-860124-860509/UNC
Highest Grade: E3
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 76X10 (Subsistence Supply Specialist)   GT: 86   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR, NDSM
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: 
Current Address: 
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      ?????

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      ?????

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 19 September 2007              
Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: ?????

Witnesses/Observers: ????? 

Exhibits Submitted: ?????

VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change ?????    No change ?????   - Character
		 			      Change ?????    No change ?????   - Reason
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
?????

Case report reviewed and verified by: Eric S. Moore, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: ?????
Other: ?????
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: ?????

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 

CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON			DATE: 21 September 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20070002051

Applicant Name:  Mr.       
______________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages