Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2010/07/26 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant, states in effect, that he feels as if he was unjustly discharged. After his injury in 2003, he started to become dependent on painkillers. Instead of being treated for this dependency on morphine and Percocet he just kept deploying overseas. He started to feel symptoms of PTSD but was never treated for it. He ended up getting divorced and had a very bad car wreck which triggered severe PTSD symptoms which to this day he still experiences in the civilian life. He deployed 3 times to Iraq and 1 time to Afghanistan with the 75th Ranger Regiment, he was injured in combat, and was put in for a Purple Heart award. He reenlisted twice, earned numerous awards and gave 100 percent to the Army. He is asking for an upgrade in order to get some help, he would also love to rejoin the Service as soon as he is capable. II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Tender Offer: NA See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits III. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 071011 Discharge Received: Date: 071121 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trail by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: HHC, 6th Ranger Tng Bn, Eglin AFB, FL Time Lost: 24 days, AWOL (070318-070410), surrendered. Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 070508, AWOL (070318-070410), reduction to E-4, forfeiture of $1,031 for two months (suspended), 45 days of extra duty and restriction (FG) Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Soldier’s Overall Record Age at current enlistment: 25 Current ENL Date: 060809 Current ENL Term: 3 Years ????? Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 02Mos, 19Days ????? Total Service: 05 Yrs, 07Mos, 17Days ????? Previous Discharges: RA 020312-050707/HD RA 050708-060808/HD Highest Grade: E-5 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No MOS: 11B10/Infantryman GT: 104 EDU: Associates Degree Overseas: SWA Combat: Afghanistan (030305-030427, Iraq (dates NIF) Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM-3, AGCM, AFEM, GWOTSM, GWOTEM, ASR, CIB, RANGER TAB V. Post-Discharge Activity City, State: ????? Post Service Accomplishments: None listed VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 October 2007, the applicant was charged with wrongfully using cocaine (070825-070827). On 31 October 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense. Further, the applicant indicated he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits. The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit and intermediate commander’s recommendations are not contained in the record. On 8 November 2007, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed a discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank. The record contains an MP Report dated 4 October 2007. b. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst recommends that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. This recommendation was made after full consideration of the former Soldier’s faithful and honorable service, as well as the record of misconduct. The evidence in this case supports a conclusion that the applicant’s characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. While the applicant's misconduct is not condoned, the analyst noted that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service, to include his combat service, and the numerous awards he received mitigated the discrediting entries in the service record. The applicant served for almost 6 years without incident, achieved the rank of Sergeant and served in combat on multiple occasions. Furthermore, the record does not support the issue that the applicant suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant, that the discharge was the result of any medical condition. At the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.” An RE code of “4” cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment. In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. However, the reason for discharge remains both proper and equitable. This action entails a restoration of grade to SPC/E-4. VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing Type of Hearing: Date: 18 March 2011 Location: Washington, DC Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: None VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicant’s length and quality of his service to include his combat service and as a result it is inequitable. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. This action entails restoration of grade to E-4/SPC. IX. Board Decision XI. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 5 No change 0 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: E-4/SPC Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20100019858 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages