Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2011/04/22 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The aplicant states, in effect, that though his discharge was warranted, he believes the under other than honorable conditions discharge was not warranted for the reason or the discharge. He was discharged for misconduct and reviewing his records the reson for his discharge was a history of minor infractions. There was nothing in the records that showed a major infraction that would warrant an other than honorable condition discharge. At the time of his meeting with the commanding officer, he stated that the reason he was giving him an other than honorable discharge because he felt that if anyone is discharged before there ETS date they should receive nothing less than a other than honorable conditions discharge. He has matured since then and deeply regret his actions at that time, which resulted in his discharge. He request the upgrade so that he might pursue the possibility of reenlisting so that he may have a chance to right his mistake. II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Tender Offer: NA See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits III. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 991220 Discharge Received: Date: 000131 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: HQ & HQ Company, 3rd Battalion, 69th Armor, Fort Stewart, GA Time Lost: The unit commanders memorandum for record indicates the applicant went AWOL (991115-991205) for 21 days and returned to his unit. However, there is no supporting documents in the OMPF to substantiate that period of AWOL and nor was it reflected on the DD Form 214, block 29 time lost. Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Soldier’s Overall Record Age at current enlistment: 18 Current ENL Date: 971118 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ????? Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 2 Mos, 13 Days ????? Total Service: 2 Yrs, 2 Mos, 13 Days ????? Previous Discharges: None Highest Grade: E-2 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No MOS: 91B10 Medical NCO GT: 85 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None Decorations/Awards: ASR V. Post-Discharge Activity City, State: ????? Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant. VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 December 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he did on numerous occasions failed to pay his debts, failed to appear in a civilian court, uttered bad checks, failed to be at his appointed place of duty, and disobeyed lawful orders. The unit commander recommended separation with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. On 20 December 1998, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander's reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 19 January 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank. b. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issue submitted with the aplication, the analyst determined that there was a mitigating factor which merits an upgrade of the applicant's discharge to general, under honorable conditions. The analyst does not condone the applicant’s misconduct; however, the evidence in this case supports a conclusion that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. While the applicant's misconduct and poor duty performance were a clear departure from acceptable Army standards, the analyst found that the length of the applicant's service; his youth and immaturity and the lack of any disciplinary action imposed on the applicant under the UCMJ mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. However, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and therefore, remains both proper and equitable. Additionally, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “3.” If the applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes. VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing Type of Hearing: Date: 18 November 2011 Location: Washington, DC Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 20 April 2011. VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. IX. Board Decision XI. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 1 No change 4 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Official: BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20110009353 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages