Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2012/04/11 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is currently attending a medical academy as a "Health Info Tech" and he is trying to receive his chapter 30 to help pay for the school. He was also told to wait six months before applying for an upgrade. II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Tender Offer: NA See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits III. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: Undated Discharge Received: Date: 111005 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Pattern of Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: Inland Cargo Tranportation Company, 10th Transportation Battalion, 7th Sustainment Brigade (R)(P), Joint Base Langley-Eustis, VA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 080123, failed to go to his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time x 3 (071213), (071101), 070914), reduced to E-1; forfeiture of $303; 14-day extra duty and restriction, (CG) 080318, failed to go to his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time (080212), 14-day extra duty and restriction (both suspended), (CG) 100604, failed to go to his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time (100426); AWOL (100329-100331); disobeyed an NCO order (100505), reduced to E-3 (suspended); 14-day extra duty, (CG) 110517, failed to go to his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time (110330); disrespectful in language toward an NCO (110223), reduced to E-3 (suspended); 14-day extra duty and restriction, (CG) Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Soldier’s Overall Record Age at current enlistment: 18 Current ENL Date: 091210 Current ENL Term: 04 Years ????? Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 09 Mos, 26 Days ????? Total Service: 04 Yrs, 09 Mos, 03 Days ????? Previous Discharges: USAR (070103-070627) / NA RA (070628-091209) / HD Highest Grade: E-4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No MOS: 88H (Cargo Specialist) GT: 87 EDU: GED Overseas: SWA Combat: Iraq (090401-100215) Decorations/Awards: AAM-2; AGCM; NDSM; ICM-CS; GWOTSM; ASR; CAB V. Post-Discharge Activity City, State: ????? Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant states, in effect, that he is attending a medical academy. VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 August 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for: receiving a company grade Article 15 (080123) for failing to report to his appointed place of duty at the time prescribed; receiving a summarized Article 15 (080318) for failing to report; receiving a company grade Article 15 (100604) for failing to report; lastly, for receiving multiple negative counselings for failing to communicate and failing to report, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. On 6 September 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 15 September 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. b. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of the former Soldier’s service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. The analyst noted the applicant's issue about his desire to use the benefits of the GI Bill. However, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing Type of Hearing: Date: 7 September 2012 Location: Washington, D.C. Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 2 April 2012; DD Form 214 for service under current review. VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. IX. Board Decision Board Vote: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) X. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder ????? Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20120007587 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages