IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 May 2015 CASE NUMBER: AR20140009506 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND STATEMENT: 1. The applicant requests to upgrade the characterization of his service from under other than honorable conditions to honorable. 2. The applicant states, in effect, his discharge is preventing him from entering the AGR program. He has served in three other units since his discharge in 2006. He served in the Army National Guard from February 2007 to February 2008 and received an honorable discharge. He then enlisted in the Army Reserve for six years with a discharge date in February 2014. He was transferred to his third unit due to his promotion. He reenlisted in May 2013 for an indefinite period. Since his discharge in 2006, he has attended numerous schools. He served over twenty years on 27 February 2014, and received his twenty-year letter on 3 April 2014. He has matured and learned from the error of his ways. DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION: a. Application Receipt Date: 27 May 2014 b. Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 22 June 2006 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: AR 135-178 e. Unit of assignment: CSH HHD, 339th MC Hosp, Coraopolis, PA f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 21 October 2000, 6 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 5 years, 8 months, 2 days h. Total Service: 14 years, 11 months i. Time Lost: NIF j. Previous Discharges: USMC (881025-980322) / NIF k. Highest Grade Achieved: E-4 l. Military Occupational Specialty: 92S10, Laundry and Shower Specialist m. GT Score: NIF n. Education: HS Graduate o. Overseas Service: SWA p. Combat Service: Afghanistan (020624-030410) q. Decorations/Awards: ARCOM-2; MCGCM; NDSM-2; SWASM-2BSS; AFRM-M DEV; SSDR-2; KLM (SA); KLM (K); CAB r. Administrative Separation Board: NIF s. Performance Ratings: None t. Counseling Statements: NIF u. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the applicant enlisted in the US Army Reserve on 21 October 2000, for a period of 6 years. He was 29 years old at the time of entry and a high school graduate. He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 92S10, Laundry and Shower Specialist. He served in Kuwait and Afghanistan. He earned two ARCOMs. He completed 14 years and 11 months of reserve and active duty service. SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES: 1. The available evidence shows the applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the United States Army Reserve. 2. The record indicates that on 22 June 2006, Department of the Army, Headquarters, Army Reserve Medical Command, Pinellas Park, FL, Orders 06-173-00012, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 22 June 2006, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. 3. The applicant’s service record does not contain any evidence of unauthorized absences or time lost. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: 1. There are no negative counseling statements or any actions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice in the available record. 2. Discharge Orders described at the preceding paragraph 2. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided with his online application, his discharge orders; ARNG retirement Points History Statement, dated 14 February 2008; NGB Form 22, dated 5 February 2008; five NCOERs (end dates of 140314, 130314, 120403, 110403, and 100403); Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 30 March 2014; and 20-year letter, dated 3 April 2014. POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: The applicant states, in effect, since this discharge, he was sent to numerous schools. Evidence in the record reflects he is currently serving as an E-6 in the US Army Reserve. REGULATORY AUTHORITY: 1. Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the policies, standards, and procedures to ensure the readiness and competency of the U.S. Army while providing for the orderly administrative separation of Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) enlisted Soldiers for a variety of reasons. The separation policies throughout the different Chapters in this regulation promote the readiness of the Army by providing an orderly means to judge the suitability of persons to serve on the basis of their conduct and their ability to meet required standards of duty performance and discipline. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, and convictions by civil authorities. 2. The characterization is based upon the quality of the Soldier’s service, including the reason for separation and determined in accordance with standards of acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty as found in the UCMJ, Army Regulations, and the time-honored customs and traditions of the Army. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. 3. Possible characterizations of service include an honorable, general, under honorable conditions, under other than honorable conditions, or uncharacterized if the Soldier is in entry-level status. However, the permissible range of characterization varies based on the reason for separation. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION: 1. The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge was carefully considered. However, after examining the applicant’s available record of service, the documents, and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The service record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to his discharge from the Army Reserve. 2. The applicant’s record contains a properly constituted set of Orders which was authenticated by the appropriate military authority. This document identifies the characterization of the discharge and the presumption of government regularity prevails in the discharge process. 3. Barring evidence to the contrary, it appears all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. 4. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that his service mitigated the type of discharge he received from the U.S. Army Reserve. 5. The applicant contentions were carefully considered. However, the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown. The burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents such as the discharge packet or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons, underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration. If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it would still be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the discharge packet is not available in the official record. 6. The applicant’s subsequent post-service accomplishments have been noted as outlined on the application and in the documents with the application. However, in review of the applicant’s available service record and absent any documented reasons for the discharge, it appears that these accomplishments do not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted at this time. 7. Therefore, based on the available evidence, it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, thus recommend the Board deny relief. SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING: Type of Hearing: Records Review Date: 20 May 2015 Location: Washington, DC Did the Applicant Testify? NA Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Board Vote: Character Change: 0 No Change: 5 Reason Change: 0 No Change: 5 (Board member names available upon request) Board Action Directed: Issue a new Discharge Order: No Change Characterization to: No Change Change Reason to: No Change Change Authority for Separation: NA Change RE Code to: NA Grade Restoration to: NA Other: NA Legend: AWOL - Absent Without Leave GD - General Discharge NA - Not applicable SCM- Summary Court Martial BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge HS - High School NIF - Not in File SPCM - Special Court Martial CG - Company Grade Article 15 HD - Honorable Discharge OAD - Ordered to Active Duty UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge CID - Criminal investigation Department MP – Military Police OMPF - Official Military Personnel File UOTHC - Under Other Than FG - Field Grade IADT – Initial Active Duty Training RE - Reentry Honorable Conditions ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont) AR20140009506 Page 2 of 5 pages ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB) CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE 1