JRE
									Docket No. 06668-06 
									2 January 2008

This is in reference to your application naval record pursuant to the pro United States Code, section 1552

A three-member panel of the Boar Records, sitting in executive session, application on 6 December 2007 injustice were reviewed in accordance regulations and procedures applicant Board. Documentary material cons of your application, together wit support thereof, your naval record regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious c record, the Board found that the insufficient to establish the existence error or injustice.

As a preliminary matter, the Boar disorder and insomnia are not con~ laws administered by the Department

The Board was not persuaded that ~ record which you cited in your  erroneous or unjust. The Board no contained in those entries was information you reported. The Boar established a basis for it to add
application for correction of your visions of title 10 of the for Correction of Naval 3510fl, considered your allegations of error and lance with administrative able to the proceedings of this considered by the Board consisted all material submitted in d and applicable statutes, consideration of the entire evidence submitted was 3tence of probable material

I noted that attention deficit considered disabilities under the of the Navy.

fly of the entries in your application are materially ted that the information ived in large part from concluded that you have not ~ny medical or psychological diagnoses to your record. In a have not demonstrated that you physical disability that was naval service. The fact that compensation from the Department probative of the existence of record because the VA awards si issue of fitness for military from active duty. The issue of benefits from the VA is a matter rather than the Department of t

In view of the foregoing, your names and votes of the members upon request.

It is regretted that the circum that favorable action cannot be the Board reconsider its decisi material evidence or other matt the Board. In this regard, it a presumption of regularity att~ Consequently, when applying for naval record, the burden is on I existence of probable material
~dition, it concluded that you were unfit for duty by reason of ~curred in or aggravated by your iou are receiving disability it of Veterans (VA) is not ~error or injustice in your naval ich benefits without regard to the ervice at the time of release your entitlement to additional r within the purview of the VA he Navy.

application has been denied. The of the panel will be furnished

stances of your case are such taken. You are entitled to have n upon submission of new and not previously considered by Ls important to keep in mind that inches to all official records. a correction of an official :he applicant to demonstrate the error or injustice.

Sincerely,
Executive