DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

BJG
Docket No:
7188-06
22 September 2005

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

You requested that the fitness report for 1 July to
22 September 2005 be modified, by deleting the reviewing officer
(RO) and third sighting officer comments, or completely removed.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 September 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In add4tion, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 8 August 2006, a copy of which is attached. The Board also considered your rebuttal letter dated 31 August 2006 with enclosure.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB, except it agreed with you that the reporting senior’s assessment” with The Board noted you provided a noncommissioned officer in charge team, but this statement did not or injustice in the fitness report above, your application has been the members of the panel will be

It is regretted that the circumstance that favorable action cannot be t the Board reconsider its decision material evidence or other matter the Board. In this regard, it is a presumption of regularity attach 

Consequently, when applying for a naval record, the burden is on the existence of probable material error RO did “challenge the respect to your judgment.  ecitement from the staff of your civil affairs tactical persuade the Board of any error at issue. In view of the denied. The names and votes of furnished upon request.

 of your case are such. You are entitled to have upon submission of new and not previously considered by important to keep in mind that Les to all official records. correction of an official applicant to demonstrate the or injustice.

Sincerely,

						W.DEAN PFEIFFER
						Executive Director