4
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH
Docket No. 26-07
10 Mar 08

This is in reference to your applicant record pursuant to the provisions of your naval record pursuant to the provisioni of 10 USC 1552

A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, consider 10 March 2008. Your allegations of error and in justice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulation to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application submitted in support thereof, your naval record statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 1160 ser N130D2/08u0128 of 4 Mar 08, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consider majority of the Board found that the e insufficient to establish the existence injustice. In this connection, the Bo the comments contained in the advisory GENADMIN l52039Z APR 03, which is the applicable at the time you enlisted, 1 EBCC to $20,000. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the request.

It is regretted that the circumstances favorable action cannot be taken. You reconsider its decision upon submission or other matter not previously consider regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.
0	USC 1552.

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice.

									Sincerely,

									W. DEAN PFEIFFER	
									Executive Director