DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 


Docket No: 1433-18 
MAR 12 2019 

Dear : 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the 
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. After careful and conscientious 
consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to 
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application 
has been denied. 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, 
considered your application on 27 November 2018. The names and votes of the members of the 
panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in 
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this 
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together 
with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, the 
Advisory Opinion (AO) furnished by the Physical Readiness Program Office (OPNAV N170), 
and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 

The Board carefully considered your desire to update the Physical Readiness Information 
Management System (PRIMS) for the Physical Readiness Test (PRT) Cycle 2-2015 to reflect 
your participation as "excused." The Board considered your contention that your score was not 
entered into PRIMS. The Board significantly agreed with the AO, that without documentation to 
support your contention, no action can be taken on your request. A copy of your waiver or other 
documentation excusing you from the PRT is required. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken 
at this time. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of 
new and material evidence. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board. 
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all 
official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the 
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence ofprobable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 
 


Executive Director