Dear : 
 
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.  After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.  Consequently, your application has been denied. 
 
A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2020.  The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.  Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, as well as applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.  The Board also considered the enclosed 10 April 2019 advisory opinion (AO) furnished by the Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), which was previously provided to you.  Although you were afforded an opportunity to submit a rebuttal, you did not do so. 
 
The Board carefully considered your request to modify your fitness report for the reporting period 16 May 2018 to 9 September 2018.  The Board considered your contention that during the time period you were at a two week course and were working under another reporting senior (RS) once you returned.  You assert that you were ordered to submit a Marine Reported on Worksheet (MROW) but worked under your reviewing officer (RO) for less than 90 days during the reporting period of the fitness report. 
 
The Board, however, substantially concurred with the AO.  The AO noted that your petition omits any endorsement from reporting officials, and that you failed to provide any evidence that your report lacked sufficient RS observation, or that you served for an undetermined stint under a different RS than annotated on the report.  Additionally, your undocumented absence for a two week course referenced in your petition would not meet minimum requirements for periods of non-availability.  Furthermore, even if accounted for, the period of performance still exceeds the minimum of 90 days. 
 
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149.  New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board.  In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.