Docket No: 3238-20 Ref: Signature Date From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF XXX XX USMC Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. § 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Administrative Remarks (Page 11) entry of 6 Nov 17 (3) ltr of 19 Feb 2020 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the reference, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board), requesting her naval record be corrected by removing the 6 November 2017 Administrative Remarks (Page 11) 6105 counseling entry from her Official Military Personnel File. 2. The Board, consisting of , reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 April 2021 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, relevant portions of Petitioner’s naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. 3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, found as follows: a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulation within the Department of the Navy. b. On 6 November 2017, Petitioner was issued enclosure (2), a Page 11 entry counseling her for an inappropriate relationship with a sergeant from Recruiting Station . c. Petitioner contends the wording “inappropriate relationship” is unjust because it’s ambiguity leaves room for interpretation. Enclosure (3) is an advocacy letter from the commanding officer (CO) who issued enclosure (2) recommending removal of the Page 11. The CO explained Petitioner was pending a divorce when she entered a relationship with another Marine thus leading to the 6105 counseling for an inappropriate relationship. The CO also emphasized that after “reviewing all of the information [he] received, coupled with a better understanding of how this entry affects [Petitioner’s] career and several testimonies from leaders within the command, [he] believe[s] that the 6105 should be removed” from Petitioner’s otherwise outstanding record. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board determined Petitioner’s request warrants relief. The Board, relying upon the CO’s explanation of “inappropriate relationship” and his recommendation to remove the counseling entry, concluded the ambiguous use of “inappropriate relationship” in the Page 11 counseling entry was unjust and determined it was in the interest of justice to remove the Page 11 entry. RECOMMENDATION In view of the above, the Board recommends the following corrective action. Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing enclosure (2), the Page 11 counseling entry of 6 November 2017. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed, or completely expunged from Petitioner’s record, and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future. This includes, but is not limited to, all information systems or database entries that reference or discuss the expunged material. 4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above-entitled matter. 5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)), and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of the reference, has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.