DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No. 3993-20 Dear : This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Section 1552 of Title 10, United States Code. After careful and conscientious consideration of relevant portions of your naval record and your application, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application has been denied. A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2021. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, as well as the 14 May 2020 decision by the Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) (the PERB Decision), and the 12 February 2020 Advisory Opinion provided to the PERB by the Manpower Management Division Records & Performance Branch (MMRP-30) (the AO). The PERB Decision and the AO were provided to you on 18 May 2020, and you were given 30 days in which to submit a response. Although you were afforded an opportunity to submit a rebuttal, you did not do so. The Board carefully considered your request to remove your 9 January 2017 to 30 January 2017 From Temporary Duty Fitness Report. The Board considered your contentions that you did not receive any adverse documentation or counselings during the reporting period, and that you were never afforded an opportunity to acknowledge or rebut the adverse nature of the report. The Board, however, substantially concurred with the AO and the PERB Decision that the report is valid as written and filed, in accordance with the applicable Performance Evaluation Manual guidance. In this regard, the Board determined that the actual basis of adversity for the report is your drop from a formal academic course of instruction for failure to maintain standards. Moreover, your Reporting Senior specifically stated that you were given an additional five day period to sign and provide a rebuttal to the report, and you elected not to do so. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149. New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, 6/2/2021 Executive Director