Docket No: 5755-20 Ref: Signature Date Dear : This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Section 1552 of Title 10, United States Code. After careful and conscientious consideration of relevant portions of your naval record and your application, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application has been denied. A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 2021. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations, and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board carefully considered your request to remove your 10 February 2016 and 31 October 2019 unit punishment books (UPBs)/non-judicial punishments (NJPs). The Board considered your contentions that the NAVMC 10132 used to document your NJP was obsolete and the current version of the NAVMC 10132 was effective before your NJPs. The Board noted that you received NJP on 10 February 2016 for violating Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for the failing to go to your appointed place of duty. The Board also noted that you received NJP on 31 October 2019 for violating Article 113, UCMJ for physically controlling a vehicle in a reckless manner with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.29 percent. The Board noted, too, that you were properly notified of your Article 31, UCMJ rights, you accepted NJPs, and you did not appeal your Commanding Officers’ (CO) decisions. The Board determined that your COs’ finding of guilt during your NJPs was just and within their discretionary authority pursuant to Article 15, the Manual for Courts-Marital (2016 ed.). The Board also determined that the recording of your NJPs on an obsolete version of the NAVMC 10132 was an administrative error that had no impact on your charges or the validity of your NJPs. Moreover, documenting your NJPs on the updated NAVMC 10132 would not have changed or influenced the outcome of your NJPs. Accordingly, the Board concluded that there is no probable material error, substantive inaccuracy, or injustice warranting corrective action. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149. New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, 7/6/21 Executive Director