From:  Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records 
To:     Secretary of the Navy 
 
Subj:   REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO    
 
Ref:   (a) Title 10 U.S.C. § 1552 
(b) Title 10 U.S.C. § 6330 
 
Encl:   (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments 
 (2) NPC email dtd 29 Sep 20 
        (3) Subject’s naval record 
 
1.  Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner’s Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) reflect discharge under High Year Tenure (HYT) or transfer to the Fleet Reserve. 
                                              
2.  The Board, consisting of , reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 October 2020 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, relevant portions of Petitioner’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 
 
3.  The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:   
 
     a.  Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy. 
 
     b.  In accordance with reference (b), the Fleet Reserve and the Fleet Marine Corps Reserve are composed of members of the naval service transferred thereto under this section.  An enlisted member of the Regular Navy or the Navy Reserve who has completed 20 or more years of active service in the armed forces may, at his request, be transferred to the Fleet Reserve.   
 
     c.  On 11 June 1993, Petitioner entered active duty. 
 
     d.  On 7 July 2009, Petitioner reenlisted for 2 years.  Furthermore, Petitioner extended enlistment for 16 months on 31 August 2010.  Moreover, Petitioner extended enlistment for 1 month on 21 October 2010.  Finally, Petitioner’s End of Active Obligated Service (EAOS) was 6 July 2011 and Soft End of Active Obligated Service (EAOS) was 6 December 2012.  
 
     e.  On 12 December 2012, Petitioner signed his Evaluation Report & Counseling Record (E1-E6) for the period of 16 November 2011 to 15 November 2012 with a trait average of 3.43, and was recommended for promotion and retention.     
 
     f.  On 26 June 2013, Petitioner was discharged. 
 
     g.  On 13 October 2020, Petitioner’s Official NSIPS/ESR listed a soft Expiration of Reserve Enlistment (EREN) of 6 July 2013. 
 
CONCLUSION 
 
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.  The Board concluded that his record contained no evidence of any reason why he was not retired.  
 
RECOMMENDATION 
 
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: 
 
The Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active duty (DD Form 214) executed on 30 June 2013 vice 26 June 2013 listed block 12c (Net active service this period) “20 years, 4 months, and 9 days” vice “20 years, 4 months, and 5 days”, block 23 (Type of separation) “Transferred to Fleet Reserve” vice “Discharged”, block 25 (Separation authority) “MILPERSMAN 1830-040” vice “MILPERSMAN 1910-104”, block 26 (Separation Code) “NBD” vice “KBK”, block 27 (Reentry code) “RE-2” vice “RE-6”, and block 28 (Narrative reason for separation) “Sufficient service for retirement” vice “Completion of required active service”.  
 
Note: Defense Finance & Accounting Service (DFAS) will complete an audit of Petitioner’s records to determine if Petitioner is due any back pay and allowances. 
                                                            
A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record. 
 
4.  It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above-entitled matter. 
 
5.  Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)), and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of the reference, has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.