DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

SSGT  USMC 

Dear Staff Sergeant :  
 
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Section 1552 of Title 10, United States Code.  After careful and conscientious consideration of relevant portions of your naval record and your application, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.  Consequently, your application has been denied.    
 
A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2021.  The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.  Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, as well as the 14 October 2020 decision by the Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) (the PERB Decision), and the 27 July 2020 Advisory Opinion (AO) provided to the PERB by the Manpower Management Division Records & Performance Branch (MMRP-30).  The PERB Decision and the AO were provided to you on 15 October 2020, and you were given 30 days in which to submit a response.  Although you were afforded an opportunity to submit a rebuttal, you did not do so. 
 
The Board carefully considered your request to remove your 1 June 2019 to 19 January 2020 fitness report and replace it with an administrative filler.  The Board considered your contention that a myriad of personal problems encountered during the end of your recruiting tour overshadowed your previous accomplishments, and were not reflective of your overall tour on recruiting duty.  You also contend that you were instructed to only recruit [high school] graduates, and that you had no definitive sector to work, which hindered your ability to meet performance expectations.   
 
The Board, however, substantially concurred with the AO and the PERB Decision that the report is valid as written and filed, in accordance with the applicable Performance Evaluation System (PES) Manual guidance.  In this regard, the Board noted that your personal situation was factored in, and that your Reviewing Officer gave you a total of six additional chances based on your personal situation, but you still did not meet the minimum performance expectations.  The Board thus determined that the adverse nature of the report was warranted.  
 
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149.  New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board.  In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 
 
Sincerely, 

8/19/2021
Executive Director