From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. § 1552 (b) BUPERSINST 1610.10D Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/enclosures (2) Evaluation Report and Counseling Record for the reporting period 5 May 17 to 12 Oct 17 (3) Evaluation Report and Counseling Record for the reporting period 17 Mar 17 to 12 Oct 17 (4) NPC memo 1610 PERS-32 of 6 Feb 20 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board), requesting that her naval record be corrected by removing the Evaluation Report and Counseling Record (Eval) for the period of 5 May 2017 to 12 October 2017. 2. The Board, consisting of , reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 March 2021, and pursuant to its regulations, determined the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, relevant portions of Petitioner’s naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. 3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, found as follows: a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulation within the Department of the Navy. b. Petitioner contends she received two Evals for the same period. She received enclosure (2) from “NR ” for the reporting period of 5 May 2017 to 12 October 2017. Petitioner received enclosure (3) from “” for the reporting period 17 March 2017 to 12 October 2017. She contends enclosure (2), which was not issued by her parent command, should be removed from her record. c. The Advisory Opinion (AO) at enclosure (4), determined that reference (b) allows for only one regular report to cover a reporting period. Upon review of Petitioner’s history of assignments, the AO noted Petitioner’s permanent assignment was “” and therefore, “” was required to maintain the regular report continuity by submitting a detachment Eval for the reporting period. Further, the AO determined that enclosure (2) is “unnecessary and should be removed” because Petitioner’s parent command “submitted a regular report that is on file and covers the same period.” CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting relief. Relying upon the justification provided in the AO, the Board concluded that Petitioner’s record shall be corrected by removing the Eval at enclosure (2). RECOMMENDATION In view of the above, the Board recommends the following corrective action. Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing enclosure (2), the Eval for the 5 May 2017 to 12 October 2017 reporting period. 4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above-entitled matter. 5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)), and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.