DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No: 2962-21 Ref: Signature Date Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Section 1552 of Title 10, United States Code. After careful and conscientious consideration of relevant portions of your naval record and your application, the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) found the evidence submitted insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application has been denied. Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on its merits. A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2021. The names and votes of the panel members will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of the Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, to include the 25 July 2018 guidance from the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness regarding equity, injustice or clemency determinations (Wilkie Memo). You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active duty on 3 September 1980. On 19 May 1981, you received non-judicial punishment (NJP) for three specifications of wrongful possession of marijuana. On 5 October 1981, you received your second NJP for disobedience of a lawful written regulation by possessing 0.6 grams of marijuana and disobedience of a lawful written regulation by possessing a trace amount of marijuana in your assigned Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (BEQ) room. On 30 December 1981, you received your third NJP for wrongful possession of alcoholic beverages in your assigned BEQ room. Unfortunately, those documents pertinent to your administrative separation are not in your official military personnel file (OMPF). However, the record does reflect the commanding officer’s (CO) recommendation for administrative separation from the Marine Corps with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service. Your Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214), reveals that you were separated from the Marine Corps on 30 April 1982 with an OTH characterization of service, your narrative reason for separation is “Misconduct - Frequent Involvement with Military Authorities” your separation code is “JKA1,” and your reenlistment code is “RE-4.” The Board carefully considered all potentially mitigating factors to determine whether the interests of justice warrant relief in your case in accordance with the Wilkie Memo. These included, but were not limited to, your desire to upgrade your discharge and contention that your narrative reason for separation is a false statement. The Board noted you did not submit any documentation or advocacy letters to be considered in support of your petition. Based upon this review, the Board concluded these potentially mitigating factors were insufficient to warrant relief. Specifically, the Board determined that your misconduct, as evidenced by three NJPs, outweighed these mitigating factors. Additionally, the Board relies on a presumption of regularity to support the official actions of public officers and, in the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary (as is the case at present), will presume that they have properly discharged their official duties. Accordingly, given the totality of the circumstances, the Board determined that your request does not merit relief. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new matters, which will require you to complete and submit a new DD Form 149. New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, 6/14/2021 Executive Director