ex-, USMC
MD06-01128

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request:

Application Received:  				20060823
Characterization of Service:			
Narrative Reason for Separation:			
Discharge Authority:				MARCORSEPMAN 6210.3
Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge:	hqbn, 2dmaRdiv camplej, nc

Applicant’s Request:	
	Characterization change to:		
	Narrative Reason change to: 		
	Review Requested:			
Representation:  					

Decision:

Date of Decision:					20070712     
Location of Board:				Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:				YES
Complete Medical Record:			YES
Complete Discharge Package:			YES
Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:	PROPER
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:	EQUITABLE

By a vote of  the Characterization shall  UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS
By a vote of  the Narrative Reason shall  MISCONDUCT  

Applicant’s Issues, as summarized by the Board:
1.  Improve employment opportunities.
2.  Reenlistment opportunity.
3.  Troubles have resolved since leaving the military.
4.  Post service. 

Summary of Service:

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP)				20010817 - 20010916		
Active:   

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment:  				20010917
Years Contracted:  				;   Extension:   
Date of Discharge:				20040416
Length of Service
	Active:					02  Yrs  07  Mths  00  Dys  (Does not exclude lost time)
	
Time Lost During This Period:			 

Education Level:  				
Age at this Enlistment:  				
AFQT:  						43
MOS:						3043
Highest Rank:					

Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):		NONE FOUND IN RECORD

 Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):   RIFLE QUALIFICATION BADGE (MARKSMAN)

Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

20030521:	NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
	Article 123a (6 specs):
	Specification 1:  On or about 20021203, wrongfully utter a certain check in the amount of $121.57 and did not have sufficient funds in the account for payment.
	Specification 2:  On or about 20021203, wrongfully utter a certain check in the amount of $5.23 and did not have sufficient funds in the account for payment.
	Specification 3:  On or about 20030418, wrongfully utter a certain check in the amount of $200.00 and did not have sufficient funds in the account for payment.
	Specification 4:  On or about 20030418, wrongfully utter a certain check in the amount of $200.00 and did not have sufficient funds in the account for payment.
	Specification 5:  On or about 20030419, wrongfully utter a certain check in the amount of $200.00 and did not have sufficient funds in the account for payment.
	Specification 6:  On or about 20030421, wrongfully utter a certain check in the amount of $200.00 and did not have sufficient funds in the account for payment.
	Article 89:  On or about 20030517 disrespect toward Captain B_ and 2Lt K_ by saying “Why are you guys being hard ass’s” and Why are you trying to be all up on me.
	Award:  Forfeiture of $645.00 for 2 months ($645.00 for one month suspended for six months), restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-2.
	Not appealed.

20030530:	Counseling:  Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct.  Your violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.  Specifically, Article 89 and 123a (six specifications) for which you were found guilty of violating during Battalion Commander nonjudicial punishment on 20030521  The behavior is counter to good order and discipline and has brought discredit to yourself and the United States Marine Corps.  Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

20030609:	Counseling:  Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct.  Your unauthorized and inappropriate use of a government computer.  Specifically, you used your assigned government computer to view offensive, pornographic material.  This conduct is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.  Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

20031217:	Counseling:  Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct.  Your assignment to the Marine Corps Body Composition Program.  Specifically, you failed to maintain your body standards as required by MCO P5100.12.  Your actions are unsatisfactory and not in accordance with the high state of readiness required by the Marine Corps.  Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

20031222:	NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
	Article 86:  On or about 0730 20031210 fail to report back in to this unit from annual leave and did so remain absent until on or about 1300 20031212.
	Award:  Forfeiture of $645.00 for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days.
	Not appealed.

20031222:	Counseling:  Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct.  Violation of Article 86 of the UCMJ.  Specifically, on 20031222 you were found guilty during Company Commanders nonjudicial punishment for violating Article 86 of the UCMJ.  Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

20040322:	NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
	Article 128:  On or about 1145, 20040227, assault Cpl K_ with his closed fists twice.
	Award:  Forfeiture of $596.00 for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-1.
	Not appealed.

20040323:	Counseling:  Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct.  Your failure adherence to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.  This behavior is counter to good order and discipline and has brought discredit to yourself and the United States Marine Corps.  Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided.

Elements of Discharge:  [INVOLUNTARY]

Date Notified:					20040406
Basis for Discharge:				 DUE TO 

Least Favorable Characterization:			
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:	
Record Supports Narrative Reason:			YES

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:		20040406
Rights Elected at Notification:
Consult with Counsel				
Obtain Copies	  				
Submit Statement(s) (date)				 
Administrative Board				

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):	UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS (20040406)
SJA review (date):				  (20040408)
Separation Authority (date):		COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D MARINE DIVISION (20040413)
Narrative Reason directed:				MISCONDUCT DUE TO A 
Characterization directed:				
Date Applicant Discharged:			20040416

Additional Information Considered by Board

Type of documentation submitted by the Applicant and considered by the Board
       
       	Document Type					#Pages
       Related to Period of Service Under Review:
	Service/Medical Record:				1
	Other Period of Service:				0
       Related to Post-Service Period:
	Community Service:				0
	Education:					0
	Employment:					0
	Health/Medical:					0
	Character Statements:				0
	Criminal Records Checks:				0
	Additional Statements from Applicant:		0
        Other Documentation (Describe Below)			0

        Total Number of Pages:				1

Applicant’s Issues, as summarized by the Board:
1.  Improve employment opportunities.
2.  Reenlistment opportunity.
3.  Troubles have resolved since leaving the military.
4.  Post service. 

Issues 1-2:  The Board determined that these Issues are not issues which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned.  The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding this issue. 

Decisional Issues:
The Board accepted Issues 3-4 for consideration.   

Issue 3 (Equity).  When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions.  An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record.  The Applicant’s service was marred by the award of  four retention warnings, three nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Articles 86, 89, 123a, and 128.  Violations of UCMJ Articles 89, 123a, and Article 128 are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial.  An upgrade to general (under honorable conditions) would be inappropriate.  Relief denied

Issue 4 (Equity).  The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge.  However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service.  Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question.  Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered.  The Applicant provided no documents for review.  The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided.  For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.  The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.  Relief denied. 
  
In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.  After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Minority Opinion

None

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A.  The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 - present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.

B.  Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs,  Part V, Para 502, Propriety  and  Para 503, Equity.

C.  The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violations of the UCMJ, Article 89, Disrespect toward a commissioned officer, Article 123a, Checks insufficient funds, and Article 128, Assault upon a noncommissioned. 

ADDENDUM:  Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures:  If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction.  You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint.  The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness.  You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “http://Boards.law.af.mil.”

Additional Reviews:  Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.  The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge.  Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.  If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits:  The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board.  There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities:  The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities.  Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.  

Reenlistment/RE-code:  Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code.  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.  Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.  An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment.  A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct:  DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation.  Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons.  Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended.  The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings.  If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record.  Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.”  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.  

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service.  The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review.  Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.  

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief.  With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.  Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.  

Board Membership:  The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

				Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
				Attn:  Naval Discharge Review Board
				720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
 				Washington Navy Yard DC  20374-5023