ex-, USMC
MD07-00205

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received:  20061204 	Characterization Received:  
Narrative Reason:  MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE (WITH ADMINISTRATIVE DISCHARGE BOARD)
Authority:  MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5

Applicant’s Request:	Characterization change to:    
			Narrative Reason change to: 
Applicant’s Issues:	1. Requests Medical Records
			2. Inequitable Discharge based on one time event

Decision

By a vote of  the Characterization shall  .	
By a vote of  the Narrative Reason shall  Secretarial Authority.

Date:  20070920    Location:  Washington D.C.  The Board found that 

Discussion

Issue 1:   either  which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or  the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned.  The Applicant is directed to write to the National Personnel Records Center (Military Personnel Records), 9700 Page Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63132-5100.  

Issue 2: ().  The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis.  If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order.  Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service.  There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs.  The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions.  When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions.  A under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record.  Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant’s service was marred by one discharge warning and two nonjudicial punishment for a violation of UCMJ Article 86 (Failure to go place of duty), Article 112a, (Wrongful use of a controlled substance), and  Article 113 (Misbehavior of Sentinel or Lookout)  .  Additionally, the Applicant received a pre-service drug waiver for THC use.  A violation of Articles 112a and 113 are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial.  An upgrade to General (Under Honorable Conditions) would have been inappropriate.   

Issue 2: ().  The Board found an inconsistency in the record.  By definition, an administrative separation is a discharge or release from active duty upon or prior to expiration of enlistment.  The applicant was discharged after his enlistment contract.  Therefore, the Board determined that the Applicant discharge should be based on the Marine’s performance at the time of his discharge.  An honorable discharge upon EAS should be awarded for Marines with average conduct marks above 4.0 and average proficiency marks above 3.0.  The Board determined that the characterization of the Applicant’s service to be characterized by an honorable discharge and a Narrative Reason of Secretarial Authority.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP)	19900612 - 19901107  		Active:   	      -      
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19901108		Years Contracted:  		Date of Discharge:  19941109
Length of Service:  04  Yrs  00  Mths  02  Dys	Lost Time:  Days UA:    Days Confined:  
Education Level:  	Age at Enlistment:  	AFQT:  35	MOS:  3531  Highest Rank:  
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):	4.3(10)/3.8(10)	Fitness reports:   
Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):  NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON, SOUTHWEST ASIA SERVICE MEDAL W/1 STAR

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19910509:	MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for failing to have a proper shave on 19910506 and 19910509.

19930610:	CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 (2 specs) - (1) Fail to show up for remedial PT on 0530, 19930520, (2) Fail to show up for Battalion Guard on 2400, 19930524, found sleeping in his rack, Art. 113 - Found sleeping on his rack while posted as Battery Guard on 0207, 19930525.
	Awarded - - FOP ($233.00) for (7 days); Restr for (14 days); Extra duties (14 days).  FOP of $117.00, restr and extra duties suspended for 6 months.

19930817:	MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for failure to maintain proper hygiene standards for my BEQ room as directed by my Chain of Command and the Barracks SOP (BnO P 11101.1C).

19931117:	MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for lack of regard for military rules and regulations and poor judgment.  Specifically, being 45 minutes late on 19931026 from morning formation and work and failing to call the Duty NCO or work and failing to call the Duty NCO or work section.

19940715:	NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 19940707, tested positive for THC.

19940727:	Substance Abuse Evaluation:
	Diagnosis:  Drug abuse.
	Recommendation:  Administratively processed for separation.

19940729:	CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a - Wrongfully use THC.
	Awarded - - FOP ($350.00) for (2 months); RIR (E-2); Restr for (60 days).

Discharge Process

Date Notified:	19940914
Basis for Discharge:	 DUE TO:  
Least Favorable Characterization:	
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:	

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:		19940914
Rights Elected at Notification:
	Consult with Counsel			
	Obtain Copies of Documents		
	Submit Statement(s) (date)			
	Administrative Board			

Administrative Board Date:	19941019
              Findings, by preponderance of the evidence:	BY   DUE TO  .
	BY  SEPARATION  WARRANTED.
              Recommendation on Separation: 	BY  
              Recommendation on Characterization:	BY  

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):	 (19940914)
SJA review (date):	
Separation Authority (date):	COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D MARINE DIVISION, MARFORLANT (19941104)
              Basis for discharge directed:	 DUE TO:  
              Characterization directed:	
Date Applicant Discharged:	19941109

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:	Service and/or Medical Record:  		Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:  	
	Employment:  			Finances:  			Education: 		
	Health/Medical Records:  		Substance Abuse:			Criminal Records:  	
	Family/Personal Status: 		Community Service:  		References:  		
	
Additional Statements From Applicant:  	From Representative:    
Other Documentation (Describe)       

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A.  Paragraph 6210, Misconduct, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D), effective 
27 June 1989 until 17 August 1995.

B.  Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.

C.  The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a and 113.

ADDENDUM:  Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures:  If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC  20301-4000.  You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint.  The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness.  You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “http://Boards.law.af.mil.”

Additional Reviews:  Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.  The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge.  Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.  If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits:  The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board.  There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities:  The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities.  Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.  

Reenlistment/RE-code:  Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code.  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.  Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.  An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment.  A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct:  DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation.  Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons.  Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended.  The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings.  If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record.  Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.”  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.  

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service.  The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review.  Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.  

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief.  With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.  Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.  

Board Membership:  The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn:  Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC  20374-5023