ex-, USMC
MD07-00476

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received:  20070227	Characterization Received:  
Narrative Reason:  PERSONALITY DISORDER 		Authority:  MARCORSEPMAN 6203.3

Applicant’s Request:	Characterization change to:  
			Narrative Reason change to: 
Applicant’s Issues:	1. Employment opportunities
			2. Service Record

Decision

By a vote of  the Characterization shall  .
By a vote of  the Narrative Reason shall  PERSONALITY DISORDER

Date:  20071025  					Location:  Washington D.C.  

Discussion

Issue 1:   either  which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or  the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned.  The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .  

Issue 2: ().   When reviewing a discharge, the NDRB does consider the extent to which a medical problem might affect an Applicant’s performance and ability to conform to the military’s standards of conduct and discipline.  The NDRB generally does not consider the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s stated condition, the implied incorrect diagnosis, nor the medical treatment given to the Applicant to be of sufficient nature to exculpate the Applicant’s narrative reason for discharge.  The Applicant was seen by competent medical authority on numerous occasions resulting in his diagnosis of personality disorder.  When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions.  A general (under honorable conditions) discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record.  The Applicant’s service was marred by the award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on one occasion for a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86 (Failure to go to an appointed place of duty) and Article 91 (Willfully disobeying a noncommissioned officer).   Violation of Article 91 or the UCMJ is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial.  The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service.  .An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.  

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.  After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that  

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP)	20020417 - 20021118  		Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20021119		Years Contracted:  ; Extension:  	Date of Discharge:  20060203
Length of Service:  3  Yrs  2  Mths  15  Dys	Lost Time:  Days UA:    Days Confined:  
Education Level:  	Age at Enlistment:  	AFQT:     53	MOS:0311   Highest Rank:  
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):	3.7(  )/4.0(  )	Fitness reports:   
Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):  SHARPSHOOTER BADGE, COMBAT ACTION RIBBBON, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT ROBBON, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL.

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20031103:	Applicant counseled this date for lack of responsibility with government property (illegally tampered with a government issued military identification card by changing the birth date).  Failure to take corrective action or future incidents of inappropriate behavior or misconduct may result in disciplinary proceedings or administrative separation.

20050307:	20050110-20050307 OIF-2
	20040407-20040512 Operation Vigilant Response
	20040220-20040710 Operation Iraqi Freedom

20050327:	Applicant hospitalized at Balboa from 20050227-20050327 for Psych 2 and SI and attempts.

20050509:	Applicant counseled for speeding with a government vehicle.  Failure to take corrective action or future incidents may result in NJP.

20050608:	Applicant not recommended for promotion to Corporal due to lack of leadership.

20050711:	Applicant not recommended for promotion to Corporal due to lack of leadership.

20050830:	Applicant counseled for diagnosed personality disorder.  Applicant to be processed for administrative separation.

20051003:	Letter from Mental Health Department to Commanding Officer 3rd Bn 4th Marines.  Applicant seen on 20050321 following his return from Iraq secondary to his suicidal ideations.  Applicant has been receiving continued psychotherapy and it is felt that there has been little to no improvement.
	Diagnosis:  Occupational Problems, Personality Disorder NOS with Narcissistic and Passive-aggressive features.
	Recommendation:  Applicant deemed fit for processing for administrative separation for Personality Disorder pending resolution of any legal matters.

20051005:	NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 (Go from appointed place of duty on 20050915) and Art. 91(Willfully disobeying a noncommissioned officer on  20050913). .
	Awarded - FOP ($692amount) for (2 months); RIR (E-2); Restr for (45 days); Extra duties (45 day.

20051017:	Applicant counseled for diagnosed personality disorder.  Failure to take corrective action or future incidents of inappropriate behavior or misconduct may result in disciplinary proceedings or administrative separation. 

Discharge Process

Date Notified:	20051018
Basis for Discharge:	 DUE TO:  
	
Least Favorable Characterization:	
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:	

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:		20051018
Rights Elected at Notification:
	Consult with Counsel			
	Obtain Copies of Documents		
	Submit Statement(s) (date)			 
	Administrative Board			

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):	 (20051020)
SJA review (date):	NOT FOND IN RECORD
Separation Authority (date):	CG, 1st MARDIV (20060130)
              Basis for discharge directed:	 DUE TO:  
              Characterization directed:	
Date Applicant Discharged:	20060203

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:	Service and/or Medical Record:  		Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:  	
	Employment:  			Finances:  			Education: 		
	Health/Medical Records:  		Substance Abuse:			Criminal Records:  	
	Family/Personal Status: 		Community Service:  		References:  		
	
Additional Statements From Applicant:  	From Representative:    
Other Documentation (Describe)       

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A.  Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6213.3 PERSONALITY DISORDER.

B.  Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.

C.  The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 91.

ADDENDUM:  Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures:  If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC  20301-4000.  You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint.  The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness.  You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “http://Boards.law.af.mil.”

Additional Reviews:  Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.  The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge.  Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.  If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits:  The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board.  There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities:  The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities.  Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.  

Reenlistment/RE-code:  Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code.  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.  Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.  An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment.  A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct:  DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation.  Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons.  Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended.  The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings.  If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record.  Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.”  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.  

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service.  The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review.  Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.  

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief.  With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.  Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.  

Board Membership:  The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn:  Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC  20374-5023