ex-SR, USN
ND07-00061

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request:

Application Received:  				20061012
	Characterization of Service:		
	Reason for Discharge:			 
	Discharge Authority:			MILPERSMAN 1910-140
	Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge:	USS CARL VINSON (CVN 70) HP: BREMERTON, WA

Applicant’s Request:	
	Characterization change to:		
	Narrative Reason change to: 		
	Review Requested:			
	Representation:				
	
Issues:	1. Reenlistment Code change
	2. Recruiter was skillfully vague, encompassed falsehood, and lacked full disclosure
3. Post Service

Issue 1:  The Board determined that this Issue is not an issue which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned.  The Applicant is directed to page one of the Addendum regarding this issue. 

Issue 2:  (Equity) The Applicant implies that her misconduct was the result of feeling used and neglected over alleged misrepresentations by her recruiter.  The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs.  The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support her issue.  There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that the recruiter misled her through the recruitment process.  The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case.  However, even if the Applicant could show misrepresentations in the recruitment process, such misrepresentations would neither amount to a justification nor to a defense for the Applicant’s own misconduct.  Relief denied.  

Issue 3:  (Equity).   The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge.  However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, good conduct, or favorable endorsements in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service.  Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question.  Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered.  The Applicant provided several documents that were received favorably by the Board.  However, the Applicant’s service was marred by two violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Articles 86 (Unauthorized Absence) and Article 87 (Missing Movement). These infractions are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial.  The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the circumstances that resulted in the characterization of discharge.  Relief denied. 

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.  After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Decision:

Date of Decision:					20070823     
Location of Board:				Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:				
Complete Medical Record:			
Complete Discharge Package:			

Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:	
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:	

By a vote of  the Characterization shall  .
      By a vote of  the Reason for Discharge shall   - .

Summary of Service:

Prior Service:
Inactive: USNR (DEP)				19990517 - 19990524  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment:  				19990525
Years Contracted:  				
Date of Discharge:				20020318
Length of Service
	Active:					02  Yrs  03  Mths  00  Dys  (does not exclude lost time)
	Inactive:					NONE
               Time Lost During This Period:	               Days UA:  UNABLE TO DETERMINE Days Confinement:               

Education Level:  				
Age at this Enlistment:  				
AFQT:  						78
Highest Rate/Rank:				SA

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
				Performance: N/A Behavior: N/A OTA: NA

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):  NONE

Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Reason for Discharge

19991018:	NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
	Article 86: (TOT 28 days absence) 
	Award:  Forfeiture of $300.00 for 2 months (1 month suspended for 6 months), restriction and extra duty for 30 days.
	No indication of appeal in the record.

19991022:	Retention Warning:  Advised of deficiency (Violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, Unauthorized absence, as evidenced by your Commanding Officer’s nonjudicial punishment imposed on 19991018), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

20011129:	Special Court-Martial.
	Charge I: Violation of the UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence. Plea: Guilty.  Finding: Guilty. 
	Charge II: Violation of the UCMJ, Article 87: Missed the movement of USS CARL VINSON on 20010723. Plea: Guilty.  Finding: Guilty. 
	Sentence: To be confined for 105 days, forfeiture of $650.00 pay per month for three months, reduction to E-1.
	CA action 20011129:  Sentence approved and ordered executed.

Elements of Discharge:  [INVOLUNTARY]

Date Notified:					20011207
Reason for Discharge	 - 
	 - 
	
Least Favorable Characterization Authorized:	

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:		20011207
Rights Elected at Notification:
Consult with Counsel			
Obtain Copies of Documents		
Submit Statement(s) (date)			 
Administrative Board			
GCMCA Review				

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):	 (20011212)
Separation Authority (date):	COMNAVPERSCOM MILLINGTON TN (20020312)
	Reason for discharge directed:		 - 
	Characterization directed:			
Date Applicant Discharged:			20020318

Additional Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Total Number of Pages:				34
       
Related to Period of Service Under Review:
	From Service and/or Medical Record:		Other Records:	

Related to Other Period(s) of Service:
	From Service and/or Medical Record:		Other Records:	
       
Related to Post-Service Period:
	Employment:					Finances:	
	Health/Medical Records:				Substance Abuse:	
	Family/Personal Status:				Education:	
 	Community Service Efforts:			References:	
	Criminal Records:			

Other:
	Additional Statements From Applicant:		From Representative:	
        	Other Documentation (Describe)		 Social Security Card, Birth Certificate, Document Accountabilty List, Letter from Grandmother, Certificate of Achievement for Basic Secuiry Guard, Certificate of Appreciation for Outstanding Security Support, Tactical Baton Certificate, Certificate of Completion for Oleoresin Capscum Aerosol Projectors, Photographs, Piston Qualification Certificate, List of family members who served in U.S.Army/National Guard/Airforce, Family photographs     

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A.  Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective
12 Dec 1997 until 21 Aug 2002, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600), SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B.  Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.

C.  The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violations of the UCMJ, Article 86, Unauthorized Absence and Article 87, Missing Movement.      .

ADDENDUM:  Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures:  If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction.  You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint.  The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness.  You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “http://Boards.law.af.mil.”

Additional Reviews:  Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.  The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge.  Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.  If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits:  The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board.  There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities:  The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities.  Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.  

Reenlistment/RE-code:  Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code.  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.  Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.  An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment.  A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct:  DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation.  Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons.  Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended.  The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings.  If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record.  Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.”  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.  

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service.  The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review.  Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.  

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief.  With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.  Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.  

Board Membership:  The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

				Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
				Attn:  Naval Discharge Review Board
				720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
				Washington Navy Yard DC  20374-5023