THIRD ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:				DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-01073
				INDEX CODE:  100.03
	
							COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

A new Board consider this evidence and promote him to brigadier general (BG) with a date of rank of 30 March 2001.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On 5 November 2003, the applicant's request to have an erroneous Air Force Inspector General (AF/IG) Report of Investigation (ROI), S55942B, removed from his record was considered and denied by the Board.  For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit I.

On 3 February 2004, the Board reconsidered and denied an amended request that he be promoted to the grade of BG with a date of rank of 30 March 2001.  The Record of Proceedings, with attachments, is at Exhibit J.

On 15 June 2004, the applicant submitted an additional amended request asking that a new Board be presented evidence that he has been unjustly targeted by Mr. A. and that he has been denied due process in that the Board interviewed the original Investigating Officer (IO) from the Air Force IG, and his right to respond to the interview was not honored.  To support his request, he has included a personal statement and copy of a Washington Post newspaper article regarding a Government Accounting Office (GAO) investigation into diploma mills and senior federal government employees.  His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit K.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided, we remain unpersuaded that the application warrants relief.  We carefully considered the statements provided by the applicant, in particular his contention that Mr. A. is the person he believes is responsible for keeping him from receiving the promotion to BG, and the statement from the TAG-SC supportings his allegations. Other than conjecture and speculation on the part of the applicant and the TAG-SC, the Board is of the opinion no evidence has been presented that would lead us to believe there was any material wrongdoing by any individuals who may or may not have had an interest in denying the applicant’s promotion to brigadier general.  Therefore, absent any credible evidence to the contrary, we can find no reason with which to grant the relief sought in this case.
_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 14 September 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit K.  Applicant’s Submission, dated 15 Jun 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit L.  2nd Addendum to Record of Proceedings, dated
                14 Sep 04, w/Exhibits.

                                   
							Panel Chair