RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03426 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation be adjusted to pay for 57.5 days of leave. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His commander offered him terminal leave but it was only after he had made plans to retire on a specific date. In support of his application, applicant provides a copy of his Leave and Earnings Statement Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant retired on 31 October 1999 in the grade of technical sergeant after serving 20 years and 22 days of total active service. The applicant’s fiscal year 2000 (FY00) pay file reflects 57.5 days of leave upon retirement. He was paid for a total of 60 days leave in March 1987 and March 1993. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIMC recommends denial and states that AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, indicates the applicant must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused his lost leave. Title 10, USC, Section 501, is the authority for payment of accrued leave upon reenlistment, retirement, and separation under honorable conditions or death. It limits payment of accrued leave to 60 days in a military career. Cumulative payment for accrued leave as an enlisted member, officer, or both cannot exceed 60 days. The applicant was paid for a total of 60 days leave. After reviewing the member's case, they find no error or injustice by the Air Force causing the member to retire with a leave balance of 57.5 days. AFPC/DPSIMC’s complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24 October 2008 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-03426 in Executive Session on 9 December 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Sep 08, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIMC, dated 10 Oct 08. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Oct 08.