RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03494 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) or Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was on temporary duty (TDY) several times during the Vietnam War for several months at a time; however, his DD Form 214 does not reflect either of the requested awards. He separated early after returning home from Vietnam and had not used his DD Form 214 for anything until recently when he applied for Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA) healthcare and noticed the awards were not reflected. In support of his request, the applicant provides a DVA cover letter and a copy of his DD Form 214. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Air Force from 24 March 1965 to 1 November 1968. He was honorably released from active duty in the grade of sergeant (E-4) with a total of three years, seven months, and eight days of active military service of which one year and six months was reflected as foreign service. His DD Form 214 indicates he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Air Force Good Conduct Medal, and Outstanding Unit Award. On 14 October 2008, the Air Force Personnel Center Directorate of Assignments requested the applicant provide any documents that reflected his service in Vietnam. The applicant responded with a personal note, a copy of two photographs, a copy of a non-rated time log, and an Aeronautical Order. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denying the applicant’s request for service time in Vietnam. DPAPP states they find no evidence the applicant was TDY or assigned to Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denying the applicant’s request for award of the VSM. DPSIDR indicates the VSM is awarded to all service members of the Armed Forces who between 4 July 1965 and 28 March 1973, served in the following areas of Southeast Asia: in Vietnam and the contiguous waters and airspace; in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia or, the airspace thereof, and in the direct support of military operations in Vietnam. DPSIDR states no official documentation (travel voucher, travel orders, decorations, etc.) were located in the applicant’s record that verifies Vietnam service. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 22 May 2009 for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence to support the applicant performed any service in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of this case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 15 July 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2008-03494 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Sep 08, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 19 Apr 09. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 5 May 09. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 May 09.