RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03535 INDEX CODE: 112.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code be changed from “2C” to “1A” to enable her to reenter the military. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was told she could rejoin the military if she wanted. Her separation was due to an unfortunate event that ruined her ability to complete basic training at the time; however, it’s been taken care of, so she would like to reenlist. In support of her appeal, the applicant provides a DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 4 March 2008, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age of 17 in the grade of airman basic (E-1). During her second week of Basic Military Training (BMT), the applicant self- referred for medical evaluation subsequent to her experiencing anxiety attacks, depressed mood, sleep disturbance, decreased concentration, and frequent crying. She was evaluated by the Behavioral Analysis Service and diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood. The psychological services provider indicated the applicant’s disorder was so severe that her ability to function in the military environment was significantly impaired and that her diagnoses did not meet retention standards for continued military service. The provider indicated that the applicant would likely benefit from psychotherapy and recommended that a discharge due to erroneous enlistment would be appropriate. On 17 March 2008, the applicant acknowledged her agreement with the provider’s findings and recommendations. On 28 March 2008, her commander notified the applicant of his intent to recommend her for an entry-level separation under the provisions of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3203, Chapter 5, Section 5C, Defective Enlistment, paragraph 5.14, under Basis for Discharge for Erroneous Enlistment. The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification and waived her rights to consult counsel and to submit statements in her own behalf. On 31 March 2008, the Assistant Staff Judge Advocate found the case to be legally sufficient. On 2 April 2008, the discharge authority approved the applicant’s discharge as an entry-level separation, with a separation code of “JFC”, narrative reason for separation as “Erroneous Entry (Other),” a reentry code of “2C” (entry-level separation), and a service characterization of “Uncharacterized.” The applicant was discharged effective 14 December 2007. She served one month on active duty. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denying the applicant’s request to change her RE code from “2C” to “1A.” DPSOA states that “1#” RE codes are reserved for those members who have completed their initial term of enlistment and are recommended for continued service. Her commander clearly informed the applicant that if his recommendation was approved, she would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. The applicant acknowledged the memorandum on 28 March 2008. In addition, first-term enlisted members are not separated with an RE code of “1A.” The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of the applicant’s request. DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. DPSOS states that airmen are given entry-level separation/uncharacterized service characterization when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service. The Department of Defense (DoD) determined if a member served less than 180 days continuous active service, it would be unfair to the member and the service to characterize their limited service. Therefore, the applicant’s uncharacterized character of service is correct and in accordance with DoD and Air Force instructions. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 9 January 2009, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 3 March 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2008-03535: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Sep 08, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 14 Oct 08. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 12 Dec 08. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Jan 09.