RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00137 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Korea. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He does not know why his service in Korea is not listed on his DD Form 214, except, that it may have been recorded as Top Secret assignments due to his graduation from Air Base Combat School. The applicant does not provide any evidence in support of his appeal. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served as an Air Policeman and was progressively promoted to the rank of airman second class. According to his DD Form 230, Service Record, Section 4, Service Outside Continental United States, the applicant served in Bremerhaven, Germany. The applicant was honorably discharged from active duty effective 10 December 1957 after serving 3 years, 3 months, and 24 days on active duty. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states that after a thorough review of the applicant’s service records, they found no evidence of time served in Korea. They sent a letter to the applicant on 9 April 2010, asking for additional information; however, they have not received a response as of the date of their advisory opinion. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 May 2010 for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00137 in Executive Session on 31 August 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Chair XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00137: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Dec 09. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 18 May 10. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 May 10. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Chair