RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00189 INDEX CODE: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE (DECEASED) HEARING DESIRED: NO (APPLICANT) ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be entitled to receive her husband’s Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When her husband retired on 1 Dec 83 from the Air Force he did not have any eligible dependents to participate in SBP. Subsequently, they were married on 18 Dec 98; however, they did not know about the plan. In support of her request, applicant provides a copy of her marriage certificate, a photo copy of their ID cards, a copy of her husband’s death certificate, and a copy of a letter from her husband’s commander. His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The decedent enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 22 May 59. He was progressively promoted to the grade of chief master sergeant (E-9), having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 Apr 80. The decedent’s records reflect he declined SBP coverage prior to his retirement on 1 Dec 83. The former member and applicant married on 18 Dec 98 and the former member died on 7 Oct 09. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR recommends denial. DPSIAR states that although the former member declined SBP coverage when he retired, regardless of his marital status at that time, he could have elected SBP coverage on behalf of the applicant during two open enrollment periods authorized by Public Law, but he failed to do so. Therefore, DPSIAR finds no evidence of an error or injustice in this case. The DPSIAR complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 Apr 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00189 in Executive Session on 20 May 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2010-00189 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Jan 10, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIAR, dated 26 Feb 10. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Apr 10. Panel Chair