RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00237 

 INDEX CODE: 111.02 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

The applicant’s request is not clear; however, it appears he is 
requesting that his Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered 
for the period 4 Feb 07 thru 3 Feb 08 be removed or changed to 
reflect an overall “5” rating. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He received an unfair and unjust rating without any 
documentation and there was no feedback during or before 
4 Feb 07 through 3 Feb 08. 

 

During his three-year assignment there was only one documented 
feedback and it was in 2006. 

 

The contested EPR indicates another EPR was given on 3 Jul 07; 
however, it was never given to him. 

 

The Evaluations Reports Appeals Board (ERAB) denied his appeal 
of the contested report. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of the 
contested EPR and ERAB correspondence. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is presently serving in the grade of senior 
airman. 

 

The ERAB returned the applicant’s appeal for a reaccomplished 
report showing feedback was not accomplished. However, after 
30 days without a response, the appeal was closed. Further, the 
commander noted, “The member signed the EPR acknowledging he 
received a mid-term feedback. Additionally, this is a strong 
EPR for a SrA and I do not believe it requires amending.” 

 


The applicant acknowledged receipt of the contested report on 
24 Apr 08, indicating all required feedback was accomplished 
during the reporting period and upon receipt of the report. 

 

A resume of the applicant’s EPRs follows: 

 

 CLOSEOUT DATE OVERALL RATING 

 

 15 Sep 03 5 

 15 Sep 04 4 

 3 Feb 05 5 

 3 Feb 06 3 

 3 Feb 07 5 

 *3 Feb 08 4 

 3 Feb 09 5 

 

*Contested report. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDEP recommends denial. DPSIDEP states there is no 
evidence the contested report is inaccurate or unjust. However, 
if the applicant can provide a statement from the rater that 
feedback was not accomplished, they would recommend the feedback 
date in Section V be removed and the comment, “Feedback was not 
accomplished IAW AFI 36-2406” be added. 

 

The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 4 Jun 10 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not received a 
response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 


rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 
BC-2010-00237 in Executive Session on 3 August 2010, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

  

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Jan 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDEP, dated 9 Apr 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Jun 10.