RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00411 INDEX CODE: 112.03 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation (DOS) of 14 Jan 13 be adjusted to reflect that he reenlisted for four years instead of five years. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He reenlisted for a term of four years, instead of five years as reflected in his record. His reenlistment contract incorrectly indicated he reenlisted for five years and he was told it would be corrected. His DOS should be four years from his reenlistment date of 15 Nov 07. Instead, his DOS incorrectly reflects 14 Jan 13. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) indicates the applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5), effective and with a date of rank of 1 Mar 08. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant has provided no evidence his term of enlistment was four years. Information extracted from both MilPDS and official finance records indicate he reenlisted for five years and two months. While neither the Air Force nor the applicant possess a copy of his 15 Nov 07 reenlistment documents, finance documents, to include any leave and earnings statement (LES), have shown his DOS as 14 Jan 13 since he entered his current enlistment in Nov 07. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 26 Mar 10 for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In view of the above, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis for us to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00411 in Executive Session on 23 Sep 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jan 10. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 10 Mar 10. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Mar 10.