RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00845 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his Vietnam service time. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was sent temporary duty (TDY) for six months to South Vietnam while he was stationed at Taipei, Taiwan, in 1968 or 1969. He was not issued any TDY orders for the short period of time. He went from Topeka, Kansas, to Tuy Hoa Air Force Base in Vietnam to work on C-130 airplanes, and then back to Forbes Air Force Base. In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement. The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Available records reflect the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force 19 May 66 and was honorably discharged on 9 Feb 70. He is credited with 3 years, 8 months, and 21 days of active service and one year, two months, and five days of Foreign Service. The remaining relevant facts are outlined in the HQ AFPC/DPAPP evaluation, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states the information provided by the applicant and his master personnel records did not contain information which reflects he served in Vietnam. Further, on 6 Aug 10, a letter was forwarded to the applicant requesting documentation such as travel vouchers, evaluation reports, letters of evaluation, decorations, or other official military documents that reflect travel was completed and the inclusive periods of travel. The applicant failed to provide the documents. DPAPP states they were able to verify and confirm boots on ground for Foreign Service at Chin Chuan Kang Air Base, Taiwan, from 4 Dec 68 to 8 Feb 70, for one year, two months, and five days, and this information is correctly reflected on his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge. The complete HQ AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Sep 10 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not received a response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2010-00845 in Executive Session on 4 November 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Feb 10, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP, dated 2 Sep 10. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 10.