RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00954 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 26 January 2002 to 17 December 2003, be replaced by a corrected copy of the same OPR which shows the correct period of the report to be 17 December 2002 to 17 December 2003. (Administratively corrected with edit: Start date changed from 17 December 2002 to 18 December 2002). 2. His OPR rendered for the period 4 August 2002 to 17 December 2002 be entered into his permanent record. (Administratively corrected with edit: Start date changed from 4 August 2002 to 26 January 2002). 3. He be given special consideration from the Developmental Team (DT) for Intermediate Developmental Education (IDE) in-residence credit based upon record corrections. __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: An OPR with incorrect dates (26 January 2002 to 17 December 2003) was submitted for record, but the corrected and signed version was not. His OPR closing 17 December 2002 has been submitted twice, but does not reflect in his records. He believes his record was incorrectly scored for both the Calendar Year (CY) 2008 and CY 2009 IDE in-residence credit consideration, possibly preventing his selection for in-residence credit for his studies at the Naval Postgraduate School. He believes the omission of one OPR and the mistake made on the other OPR may have erroneously skewed the scoring of his record to be below the cutline for the IDE in-residence DT. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement, with attachments; copies of the OPRs in question; records transmittal, and electronic communication. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. __________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of major (O-4) with a Total Active Federal Military Service Date and Total Active Federal Commissioned Service Date of 25 May 1997. The remaining relevant facts extracted from the applicant service records are contained in the evaluations by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility at Exhibit B and C. __________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAOC recommends denial. DPAOC states the applicant’s record was reviewed including the additional/corrected OPRs; however, his record does not meet the standard required by the Combat Air Force’s Development Team (CAF DT) to be considered for equivalency credit. The complete DPAOC evaluation is at Exhibit C. __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 7 January 2011 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no response. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice in regard to the applicant’s request for equivalency credit. We note that the applicant’s request to have his OPRs closing 17 December 2002 and 17 December 2003 corrected and made a matter of record has been administratively corrected by AFPC. We agree with these corrections. Therefore, we will only address his request for special consideration for IDE in-residence credit. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we note the Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed the applicant’s record for equivalency credit and has determined it does not meet the standard required by the CAF DT. Based on the foregoing, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00954 in Executive Session on 23 February 2011, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00954: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Mar 10, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAOC, dated 15 Dec 10. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Jan 11.