RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01953 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation of “Released due to Demobilization” be changed. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was not released due to demobilization and her unit was still mobilized when she was discharged. She had two years left on her Reserve duty. She had a mental break down and was locked up in a psychiatric unit and was not able to return to her job. Her unit sent her home without out-processing her. In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Available records reflect the applicant entered a period of active duty service on 14 Feb 03 and was honorably discharged on 27 Jul 03 due to demobilization. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/SG states that after a review of all medical databases, they were unable to locate documentation or information regarding any hospitalization or psychiatric diagnosis. Further, based on the complete lack of supporting medical documentation, they cannot provide further comment at this time. The complete HQ AFRC/SG evaluation is at Exhibit B. HQ AFRC/A1K recommends denial. A1K states that since the applicant has not provided documentation that warrants HQ AFRC/SG’s support of her assertion, there is no basis for the requested change. The complete HQ AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant questions the legality of her discharge and the whereabouts of her medical records. She provides a timeline of actions. The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2010-01953 in Executive Session on 16 November 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 May 10, w/atch. Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFRC/SGP, dated 9 Aug 10. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFRC/A1K, dated 13 Sep 10. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Oct 10. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 26 Oct 10.