RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01996 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “2C” which denotes “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service” be changed to “1” which denotes “eligible to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not yet considered under the Selective Reenlistment Program.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Even though she failed her career development course (CDC), it is unfair she was not given the option to retrain into a different career field. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. On 26 February 2007, the commander notified her that he was recommending her discharge from the Air Force for unsatisfactory performance. The specific reason for this action is the applicant failed to score satisfactorily on her CDC. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states the applicant received counseling on several occasions and was afforded ample opportunity to overcome her deficiencies. DPSOS found no error or injustices in the processing of the discharge action. Based on the documentation in the master personnel record, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant provided no facts warranting a change to her separation code or narrative reason for separation. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant does not state her RE code is wrong nor does she provide any evidence an error or injustice in reference to her RE code. The applicant’s RE code is driven by her involuntary separation for unsatisfactory performance with an honorable discharge. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to applicant on 17 December 2010 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting his request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01996 in Executive Session on 15 February 2011, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, 16 May 2010, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 9 Nov 10. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 15 Nov 10 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Dec 10.