ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03240 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code be changed from “2X” to “1.” ________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 17 May 11, the Board considered and denied applicant’s original request to have his RE and separation program designator (SPD) codes changed so that he may reenlist in the military. He contended that he was unfairly separated for missing deployment training and that he had no instances of serious misconduct (i.e. driving under the influence (DUI) or non-judicial punishment (NJP)). After reviewing all the facts and circumstances of the case, the Board determined the applicant’s discharge was carried out in accordance with the substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and there was no evidence of an error or injustice. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. By virtue of a DD Form 149, with attachments, the applicant requests reconsideration of his request, contending that he was on leave getting married during the alleged missed appointment that caused his discharge. Furthermore, the date of the alleged missed appointment is not stated in the AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration. Finally, all his enlisted performance reports were good, with the exception of his last one. In support of his request for reconsideration, the applicant provides a copy of his AF Form 418, DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and marriage certificate. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit G. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support of his request, we remain unconvinced the applicant has been a victim of an error or injustice. We have previously determined the applicant’s discharge due to being denied reenlistment was proper and in compliance with the requirements of the governing directives. While the applicant’s contentions are duly noted, his latest submission has not persuaded us otherwise. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered the applicant’s request for reconsideration of AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-03240 in Executive Session on 7 Feb 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following additional documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 1 Jun 11, w/atchs. Exhibit G. Letter, DD Form 149, dated 9 Feb 12, w/atch.