RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03576 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He believes his unit may have overlooked awarding him the MSM because he did not have an official retirement ceremony. After separating from the Regular Air Force, he served in the Arizona Air National Guard from which he retired on 26 Sep 08. His other awards include seven MSMs; two Air Force Good Conduct Medals, three Air Force Achievement Medals, and many other medals and awards. In support of his request, the applicant provides excerpts from his military personnel file. His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant served in the Air National Guard and retired on 26 Sep 08 in the grade of master sergeant (E-7), having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 Jun 06. Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends denial. A1PS states that after conferring with the applicant’s unit, the approval authority did not concur on the MSM submission. Per an e-mail communication from the applicant’s unit, they do not believe the award is an entitlement and they did not believe he was deserving of the medal at the time of his enlistment and upon his retirement. The NGB/A1PS complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. NGB/A1PS recommends denial. A1PS concurs with the Subject Matter Expert advisory. The NGB/A1PS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant on 11 Mar 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-03576 in Executive Session on 19 Apr 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Oct 10, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letters, NGB/A1PS, dated 8 Mar 11, w/atch. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Mar 11.