RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03800 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her surname on her retirement check reflect rather than . 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The applicant married on 21 August 2010 and her maiden name still 
appears on her retirement check. 

 

The evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in 
this Record of Proceedings. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIR recommends denial. DPSIR states that documentation 
required to change or correct a name are birth, baptismal, 
marriage, or naturalization certificate, civil court order, or 
other legal documents and table A7.2 rule five states that a 
statement of circumstances and the original or certified copy of 
a public record, birth or baptismal certificate. A letter was 
sent to the applicant on 20 October 2010, requesting the original 
or a certified copy of the divorce decree. As of 20 December 
2010, the applicant has failed to provide the necessary 
documents. 

 

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 
14 January 2011 for review and response. As of this date, no 
response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After careful 
consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence 
of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to 
warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the 
advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and 
have not been adequately rebutted by applicant. Absent 
persuasive evidence the applicant was denied rights to which 
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or 
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to 
disturb the existing record. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-03800 in Executive Session on 23 February 2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 
 

 

 

 

 
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-03800 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 October 2010, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIR, dated 20 December 2010, w/atch. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 January 2011.