RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01614 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes “First term, second term or career airman non-selected for reenlistment” be changed to RE code 3A, which denotes “First term airman (FTA) who separates before completing 36 months (60 months for a six-year enlistee on current enlistment and who has no known disqualifying factors or ineligibility conditions except grade, skill level, and insufficient total active federal military service (TAFMS). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 1. He has learned from his mistakes, is a better person due to the consequences of his actions, wants to better himself and make his family strive for excellence so he can continue to serve his country. 2. He does not have a job, has a wife and three children. The applicant did not provide any documentation in support of his request. The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 16 December 2008, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. On 29 Mar 10, the applicant’s supervisor initiated an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration, and non-recommended him for reenlistment. His supervisor stated he displayed a lack of conformity to military lifestyle, lack of discipline and integrity, no compliance to standards, dereliction of duty, aberrant behaviors, and a poor attitude. Also, he had been decertified on numerous core tasks and could not be trusted or depended on to do any assigned tasks. In addition, the applicant received a letter of counseling (LOC), three letters of reprimand (LORs) and an Article 15. His commander denied his reenlistment request and stated the applicant displayed an inability to comply with Air Force standards and Core Values. On 31 Mar 10, the applicant acknowledged his non-selection. On 2 Apr 10, he invoked his intent not to appeal the denial decision. On 30 Jun 10, the applicant was separated with an honorable discharge due to his non-selection for reenlistment; with an RE code of 2X and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JBK (Completion of Required Active Service). He served 1 year, 6 months and 15 days of total active service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant did not provide any proof of an error or injustice, but only states he has learned from his mistakes and is a better person due to the consequences. The applicant’s RE code 2X is required based on his non- selection for reenlistment by his commander under the SRP. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Jun 11, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not received a response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The RE Code “2X” issued at the time of his separation accurately reflects the circumstances of his separation and should remain unchanged. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01614 in Executive Session on 13 Sep 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jan 11, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOA, Letter, dated 27 May 11. Exhibit D. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 17 Jun 11.