RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01928 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). 2. He be awarded the Vietnam Defense Commemorative Medal (VDCM). 3. Block 22C, Foreign and/or Sea Service, of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be changed from 3 months 5 days to 6 months and 4 days or 184 days. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Government wanted to keep the location of his Foreign Service secret. His record should be corrected to include the time he spent in Thailand. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, copies of his TDY orders, Special Order T-391 and its amendments, a copy of Special Order T-505 and other supporting documentation. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force 18 February 1964. On 24 May 1967, he completed a form stating he was in Thailand from 1–21 September 1965 and again from 8-28 September 1966. He further stated he had no combat missions. His AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, notes he had “Sea TDY” from 1-21 September 1965 and again from 8-28 September 1966. There is also a TDY listed from 28 September-26 November 1966, however, the location of that TDY cannot be verified. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPISDR recommends denial. Air Force Personnel Center Directorate of Assignments confirmed the applicant’s boots on the ground in Thailand from 1-21 September 1965 and 8-28 September 1966, for a total of 42 days. The VSM was created by Executive Order 11231 for service members who between, 4 July 1965 and 28 March 1973, served in Vietnam, Thailand, Laos or Cambodia or the airspace there over in direct support of operations in Vietnam. The member must have been TDY for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-consecutive days for the award of the VSM. In accordance with Executive Order 11231 and Department of Defense Manual 1348.33, the applicant did not serve in these areas for the prescribed time and does not qualify for the VSM. Additionally, the Air Force does not issue or award commemorative medals at the cost of the Government. The VDCM cannot be awarded. The complete DPSIDR evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he kept records of his movements. He has no record of an additional TDY to Thailand in 1966: that is an error. The actual date should be 1965 to coincide with his TDY to Thailand. The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission and the available evidence of record in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01928 in Executive Session on 12 January 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 May 11, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 10 Nov 11, w/atch. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Dec 11. Exhibit E. Applicant’s Response, undated.