RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02346 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He enrolled both of his sons in the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer Eligibility Benefit (TEB) program. He requested 24 months for his oldest son and 12 months for his youngest son. His oldest son has received the benefits; however, he was informed by the Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA) that his youngest son is not authorized the benefit. He does not know why his youngest son’s enrollment did not go through. In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 30 Sep 10, the applicant was released from active duty service for voluntary retirement – maximum service or time in grade. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1PA recommends denial. A1PA states the applicant did not submit documentation to support his assertion that he submitted a request to transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his younger son prior to his retirement on 1 Oct 10. A1PA states a review of the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) TEB website reflects the applicant’s 24-month transfer to his oldest son and there is no evidence of a second transfer request. A1PA notes the applicant had the opportunity and time to ensure the transfer of benefits had actually consummated before he retired on 1 Oct 10. The complete A1PA evaluation is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 Jul 11, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 26 Mar 12, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC- 2011-02346: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Jun 11, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, HQ USAF/A1PA, dated 26 Jul 11. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Jul 11.