RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02671 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to the Good Conduct Medal (GCM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He believes he should have been awarded the GCM and other awards based on his Air Force service. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 16 Nov 59 separation; honorable discharge certificate from the United States Navy, and a letter from his local veterans service organization. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Nov 55, for a period of four years. He was honorably discharged on 16 Nov 59 and credited with 4 years, 5 months, and 14 days of total service. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial, stating, in part, based on review of his records, they could not verify the applicant met or exceeded the criteria for the award of the GCM. In addition, they note the applicant received disciplinary punishment during his first term of enlistment and as a result, received a reduction in grade. No official documentation was located that verifies the commander recommended the applicant for award of the GCM. A detailed search of the applicant's official personnel record did not find that he was entitled to any other medal or award as a result of his military service. In addition, no documentation was found which would indicate that the Article 15 administered to the applicant had been removed from his official military record. The GCM is awarded to enlisted members who have honorably completed three continuous years of active military service subsequent to 26 August 1940, and who are recommended by their commanding officers for exemplary behavior, efficiency ratings of excellent or higher throughout the qualifying period, including time spent in attendance at service schools, and there must have been no convictions by court martial. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Oct 11 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-02671 in Executive Session on 19 April 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Jul 11, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 23 Sep 11. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 28 Oct 11. Panel Chair