RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03251 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his temporary duty (TDY) to Thailand (will be administratively corrected) 2. His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect his TDY to Vietnam. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served TDY in Thailand and Vietnam and the omission of these facts will affect his Veterans Administration benefits. In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of his DD Form 214 and several letters of appreciation. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ______________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Air Force from 28 Jun 66 to 27 Jun 70. His DD Form 214 reflects a total of 4 years of total active service, which includes 1 year, 6 months, and 11 days of Foreign Service. The Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), created on 8 Jul 65, is awarded to all service members of the Armed Forces who, between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, served in the following areas of Southeast Asia: in Vietnam and the contiguous waters and airspace; in Thailand, Laos or Cambodia or the airspace there over in the direct support of military operations in Vietnam. The specific eligibility criteria requires a member to be either: Attached to or regularly serving for one, or more, days with an organization participating in or directly supporting ground (military) operations, Attached to or regularly serving for one, or more, days aboard a naval vessel directly supporting military operations, Actually participate as a crew member in one or more aerial flights directly supporting military operations, or Serve on temporary duty for 30 consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days, which may be waived for personnel participating in actual combat operations. ______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted failed to provide any documents that substantiated foreign service time in Vietnam; however, they did verify and confirm foreign service for boots on the ground at Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines, from 16 Dec 68 to 26 Jun 70 and his TDY to Thailand in the fall of 1969. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 10 Nov 11, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit D). ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant correcting his records to reflect service in Vietnam. We note the applicant’s records have been administratively corrected to reflect his foreign service in Thailand. Therefore, the only remaining issue before us is his request to document his foreign service in Vietnam. In this regard, we took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice to warrant correcting his records to reflect service in Vietnam. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ______________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 16 Feb 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2011-03251: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Aug 11, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 1 Nov 11 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Nov 11.