RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03900 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “4I” (Serving on Control Roster) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was placed on the Control Roster (CR) due to one of his troops being involved in an investigation with four other service members of the squadron. He was told the case was dropped, and he was no longer on the Control Roster, and was free to separate under the force shaping program. The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, indicates he enlisted in the Air Force on 3 Oct 96. He was honorably released from active duty on 15 Jan 05 with an RE code of 4I and was transferred to the Air Force Reserve. He was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve on 15 Jan 08. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, noting the applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding his RE code. The applicant was separated under the Rollback Program with an honorable character of service and an RE code of 4I (Serving on Control Roster). He blames his troop for him being on the CR; however, members are not placed on the CR for someone else’s actions as the applicant contends. The applicant also states he was no longer on the CR and free to separate under force shaping; however, the Rollback Program is not a voluntary program and service members who separate under it are not voluntarily separated. In addition, separation pay is not provided to service members who voluntarily separate. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 Dec 11, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03900 in Executive Session on 15 May 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03900 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Sep 11. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Military Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, 14 Nov 11. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Dec 11.