RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect his foreign service to Vietnam, Thailand, and the Philippines. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His records do not reflect his temporary duty to Vietnam, Thailand, or the Philippines. The applicant does not provide any supporting documentation. His complete submission is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 11 Jul 69. He received an honorable discharge on 16 Feb 76 after serving 6 years, 7 months, and 6 days on active duty of which 3 years and 16 days were credited as foreign service. AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant on 15 Nov 11 that they were able to verify and confirm boots on ground at Ching Chuan Kang Air Base, Taiwan from 25 Jan 70 to 25 Apr 71 for 1 year, 3 months, and 1 day; Ching Chuan Kang Air Base, Taiwan from 8 Jan 72 to 29 Sep 73, for 1 year, 8 months, and 22 days; Clark Air Base, Republic of Philipphines from 23 Nov 73 to 10 Sep 74, for 9 months and 19 days of foreign service. The applicant’s foreign service time is accurately reflected on his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 16 Feb 72; therefore, there is no need for a change to his foreign service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. The applicant’s master personnel records did not contain information that reflects he served in Vietnam or Thailand. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Mar 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03966 in Executive Session on 28 Jun 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 oct 11. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 21 Mar 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Mar 12.