RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04257 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, reflect “Full Participant or Regular Duty” rather than “Training Only Status”. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He operated a theater at Sheppard AFB for eight hours a day in direct support of the war effort. In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214. The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Air Force Air National Guard (ANG) on 28 June 1968. On 8 April 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the ANG State of Tennessee, under the provisions of AFM 35-3, Completion of Active Duty Training. He served 8 months and 11 days on active duty. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1POE recommends denial. A1POE states the applicant’s complaint does not substantiate an error. The applicant was in a training status from 28 June 1968 to 8 April 1969, which is annotated on the applicant’s DD Form 214, dated 24 April 1970. This office was not able to find any documentation in the applicant’s master personnel record, nor in the documentation provided to validate his claim that he operated a theater at Sheppard AFB in direct support of the war effort. The A1POE complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. NGB/A1PS concurs with the NGB/A1POE advisory and recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The A1PS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 23 March 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04257 in Executive Session on 30 May 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04257 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 October 2011, w/atch. Exhibit B. Letter, NGB/A1POE, dated 9 March 2012. Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 12 March 2012. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 March 2012.