RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04271 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade/rank on his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect E4. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: As he was leaving Vietnam, his sergeant gave him stripes and told him he was at a higher grade. He wants his grade corrected for the sake of his family. The applicant submits no supporting documentation. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was a member of the Regular Air Force from 19 February 1963 to 27 January 1967. He was honorably discharged and credited with 3 years, 11 months and 9 days of active duty service. The applicant’s grade was listed as Airman Second Class/E3, with a date of rank of 1 February 1964. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends the application be time barred. To be considered for promotion to A1C the applicant must have 12 months time in grade, possess a skill level commensurate with their Air Force Specialty Code, and be recommended by the commander. Based on his date of rank of 1 February 1964, he would have been time in grade eligible for promotion to A1C. A review of the applicant’s record reveals no promotion orders to the rank of A1C. While he may have been deserving of a promotion, he has provided no documentation supporting his claim. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 February 2012, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no response. ________________________________________________________________ FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD: After careful consideration of applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we find the application untimely. The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36- 2603. The applicant has not shown a plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that the record raises issues of error or injustice which require resolution on the merits. Thus, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice to excuse applicant’s failure to file in a timely manner. ________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE BOARD: The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest of justice to waive the untimeliness. It is the decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04271 in Executive Session on 15 March 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2011-04271 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Oct 11. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 18 Jan 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Feb 12.