RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05063 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is homeless and needs his discharge upgraded to be eligible for a Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Grant Per Diem (GPD) program. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 27 Nov 81, the applicant contracted his enlistment in the Air Force. On 19 Sep 83, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for misconduct – conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. The specific reason for the discharge action was the applicant received two Article 15s for failure to go and wrongful use of marijuana; three letters of counseling, and two letters for missing substance abuse group appointments. His commander advised him of his rights in this matter. The applicant acknowledged receipt of the action and waived his right to submit a statement. On 6 Oct 83, the case was found legally sufficient and, on 7 Oct 83, the discharge authority directed the applicant be furnished a general (under honorable conditions) discharge without probation and rehabilitation. On 13 Oct 83, he was furnished a general (under honorable conditions) discharge and was credited with 1 year, 10 months, and 17 days of active service. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report, which is at Exhibit C. On 11 Jun 12, a copy of the FBI Investigative Report and a request for post-service information was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses committed. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend granting the relief sought. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-05063 in Executive Session on 7 Aug 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Jan 12, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Military Personnel Records. Exhibit C. FBI Investigative Report. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jun 12, w/atch.