RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01355 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his spouse and daughter, rather than just his son. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on the information provided, he was never told of the requirement to enter the number “1” for each dependent, into the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) database, to allow his dependents to remain eligible for TEB after his retirement from the Armed Forces. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of an electronic communiqué. His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant retired effective 1 Oct 2011. Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air National Guard. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/AlY recommends approval. A1Y states that Public Law No. 110-252, section 3319 (f)(2)(A) states: "In General - An individual transferring entitlement under this section may modify or revoke at any time the transfer of any unused portion of the entitlement so transferred." Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003- Post-9/11 GI Bill, 22 Jun 2009, (reissued 14 Sep 2011) attachment 2, paragraph 3g (2) (a) 2 states: "An individual may not add dependents after retirement or separation from the Armed Forces, but may modify the number of months of the transferred benefit after retirement or separation for those dependents who had received transferred benefits prior to separation or retirement." Both of these documents were published on government-hosted websites prior to the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. While the applicant did not designate his spouse and daughter to receive benefits prior to his retirement as defined in DTM 09-003, there is no indication he received the proper guidance when submitting the transfer request. Additionally, the transfer worksheet specifically states "can modify or revoke my election at any time." The complete A1Y evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 31 May 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we believe it is in the interest of justice to recommend granting the requested relief. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice. Accordingly, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that effective 3 Jun 2011, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his spouse, son and daughter, rather than just his son. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 2 Jul 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2013- 01355: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Mar 2013, w/atch. Exhibit B. Letter, NGB/A1Y, dated 16 May 2013, w/atchs. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 May 2013. Panel Chair 2 2