RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01361 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES CONGRESSIONAL INTEREST: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with anhonorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a waiverable code. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He met the physical standards and requirements for service in theAir Force when he completed Basic Military Training. His AETC Form 125A, Record of Administrative Training Action, states he should be considered for reinstatement in the Combat Control Selection Course (CCSC) at a later date; however, his RE coderenders him ineligible for reenlistment. In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DDForm 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; his AETC Form 125A, his student training report and CongressionalInquiry. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is atExhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 16 Nov 10, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. On 2 Mar 11, he was recommended for discharge due to failure topass the CCSC Deployment Operations Team (DOT) 10 and DOT1 physical training evaluations. On 21 Mar 11, he was issued an entry level separation withuncharacterized service for entry level performance or conduct. He served six months and two days on active duty. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOE states the applicant’s REcode is required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, Chapter 5 and based on his entry level separation with uncharacterized service. In addition, he has not providedevidence of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code. The statement on his AF Form 125A does not entitle him to reenter the Air Force but allows him to be considered for the CCSC againif he is allowed back in service. DPSOA notes the RE code 2C can be waived if any recruitingservice feels it appropriate. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at exhibit B. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicanton 30 May 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit C). THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existinglaw or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits ofthe case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendationof the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt itsrationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant hasnot been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in theabsence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis torecommend granting the relief sought in this application. 4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has notbeen shown that a personal appearance with or without counselwill materially add to our understanding of the issue involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. 2 THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did notdemonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; thatthe application was denied without a personal appearance; andthat the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not consideredwith this application. The following members of the Board considered this application inExecutive Session on 5 Feb 13, under the provisions of AFI 362603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC2012- 01361: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Feb 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 14 May 12. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 12. Panel Chair 3