RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01986 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 6 April 2012 be 
adjusted to reflect incomplete in the Air Force Fitness 
Management System (AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Through errors made by the Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) 
and the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC), his score of an 
incomplete, due to an injury he incurred during the fitness 
test, was updated as unsatisfactory. He contacted his UFPM and 
FAC and talked with them and his first sergeant. His first 
sergeant and commander have provided a memorandum for record 
(MFR) stating that his fitness record needs to be corrected. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
commander’s memorandum for record, his AF Form 469, Duty 
Limiting Conditions, a note from his doctor, and his fitness 
test history. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of Senior Airman (SrA), E-4. 

 

By letter dated 31 May 2012, AFPC/DPSIM requested the applicant 
provide additional supporting documentation to substantiate his 
claim; specifically, a copy of AF Form 422, Notification of Air 
Force Member’s Qualification Status, indicating his 
limitations/exemptions (Exhibit B). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio portion of the fitness 
assessment dated 6 April 2012 be updated to reflect “exempt” in 
AFFMS. The applicant provided an AF Form 469, dated 
6 April 2012, stating “no running >100 yards and no continuous 
walking > 3/4 miles.” With the exemption of the cardio portion 
of the fitness assessment the applicant’s overall composite 
score will change to reflect 94.25 (Excellent). 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 1 October 2012 for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit D). To date, this office has not received a 
response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant 
partial relief. We took notice of the applicant's complete 
submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree 
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility that correction of the cardio portion of 
the fitness assessment dated 6 April 2012 reflect “exempt” in 
the Air Force Fitness Management System. We believe correcting 
the record in this manner provides the applicant proper and 
fitting relief. Accordingly, we recommend that his records be 
corrected to the extent indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show the cardio 
portion of the fitness assessment dated 6 April 2012 be amended 
to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System. 

 


________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
BC-2012-01986 in Executive Session on 23 January 2013, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 May 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 31 May 2012. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 18 September 2012, 
w/atchs. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 October 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 
Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member